Sandeep Aggarwal vs Priyanka Agarwal on 20 July, 2021, DHC MAT. APP. (F.C.) 142/2020

You are currently viewing Sandeep Aggarwal vs Priyanka Agarwal on 20 July, 2021, DHC MAT. APP. (F.C.) 142/2020
  • Post category:Divorce
  • Post comments:0 Comments
  • Post last modified:January 8, 2022

CORAM:  MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
Dated: Pronounced on: 24.12.2021 

{Para 49} The fact that the parties could not live together beyond nine weeks itself shows that the mental disorder suffered by the respondent is of a kind, and to such an extent as to be unfit for marriage and the procreation of children. It is not the case of the respondent that either of the conditions enumerated in Section 12(2)(a)(i), or (ii) exists in the present case, which would have debarred the appellant from seeking annulment of marriage on the ground contained in Section 12(1)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act. That is not the defence set up by her, or established by her. The failure on the part of the respondent to disclose her mental disorder before her marriage with the appellant – as alleged by him, constituted a fraud perpetrated upon the appellant. Apart from stating that the parties had met a few times before the marriage, the respondent has not specifically averred, or established, that the appellant was made aware of the mental disorder suffered by the respondent, which was passed-off by her as mere “headaches”. Headaches–by themselves are not a disease. They are only symptoms of a disease. The Respondent does not state what caused her such serious and frequent headaches, which debilitated her from completing her studies. {Para 49}

Leave a Reply