SIF ONE Men Helpline 8882 498 498
SIF ONE Helpline (8882 498 498) has been receiving thousands of calls each month from men across India as well as overseas, men who are battered, abused, depressed by the widespread male-hatred in the Society.
NGO for Men
In Anurag Vijaykumar Goel v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (Crl. A. No. 5277 of 2024), the Supreme Court delivered a significant judgment on August 5, 2025, dissolving the marriage of the parties under Article 142 of the Constitution due to an irretrievable breakdown of marriage and clarified that LinkedIn …Read More »- Case Title: Mukund Kumar Jha vs. Rita JhaCourt: High Court of DelhiCoram: Justice Anil Kshetrapal & Justice Harish Vaidyanathan ShankarJudgment Reserved On: 19 August 2025Judgment Delivered On: 27 August 2025Case No.: MAT.APP.(F.C.) 49/2025 Background Key Facts Appellant’s Contentions (Wife) Respondent’s Contentions (Husband) Court’s Observations Decision Key TakeawaysRead More »
- Case Title: Ravi Prakash Saxena @ Ravi Prakash vs. Priyanka RaniCourt: Patna High CourtCoram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bibek ChaudhuriDate of Judgment: 04 September 2025Case No.: Criminal Revision No. 676 of 2024 Background Petitioner’s Contentions Respondent’s Contentions Court’s Observations Decision Key Takeaways Suggested Titles for Web PostRead More »
- The Delhi High Court, in MAT.APP.(F.C.) 112/2025, Nitin Jain v. Pallavi Jain, dismissed the husband’s appeal against the Family Court’s decree dissolving the marriage under Section 13(1A)(ii) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. Facts: Appellant’s Grounds: High Court’s Findings: Outcome:Appeal dismissed; divorce decree upheldRead More »
- Bombay High Court Quashes DV Case for Lack of Domestic Relationship Aurangabad, Maharashtra – December 13, 2023:In a significant ruling that reinforces the foundational criteria for filing complaints under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act (DV Act), the Aurangabad bench of the Bombay High Court quashed criminal proceedings …Read More »
- VIBHOR GARG Vs Neha The apex court said the fact that spouses are recording their conversations of each other is proof in itself that their marriage is not going strong and hence can be used in the judicial proceedings The Supreme Court on Monday (July 14, 2025) held that secretly …Read More »
Recent Posts
- SC: LinkedIn Profile Not Valid Proof of Income, Rejects Wife’s demand of ₹12 Crores alimony. Quashes 498A Case and Grants Divorce
- Delhi HC annulled Marriage Over Concealment of Wife’s Infertility
- Patna High Court Sets Aside ₹20K Monthly Maintenance, Affidavits of Assets & Liabilities Must Be Filed Before Deciding Maintenance Rajnish v. Neha
- Delhi High Court Upholds Divorce After Year-Long Separation Despite Pending Restitution Decree
- Domestic Violence Case Quashed for Lack of Domestic Relationship : Bombay HC
- Secret recording of conversations of spouses can be used in matrimonial cases: Supreme Court
- MWT Critical Objections to Karnatak FakeNews 2025 Bill
- High Court can Quash DV U/S 482 & 528 BNSS : SC as on 19 May 2025
- Wife can’t claim maintenance , Where wife Divorced on ground of Adultery
- Supreme court guidelines and judgements on matters related to police and Judicial Process
- MINISTERY OF HOME AFFAIRS GUIDELINES FOR ISSUEING SUMMONS IN JUDICIAL CASES TO PERSONS LIVING ABROAD (MLATs with 25 countries)
- Garima Jain Vs Rohit Jain , Delhi High Court as on 28 April 2025
- Sharmila Velamur vs V. Sanjay and Ors. , SC As on 3 March 2025
Together we can make a difference
