SIF ONE Men Helpline 8882 498 498
SIF ONE Helpline (8882 498 498) has been receiving thousands of calls each month from men across India as well as overseas, men who are battered, abused, depressed by the widespread male-hatred in the Society.
NGO for Men
JINESH Vs. ASWATHY as on 19 November 2025, Kerela High Court 5. Section 125 of Cr.P.C. (Section 144 of BNSS) states that a husband with sufficient means is liable to provide maintenance to his wife who cannot support herself. However, the wife’s right to claim maintenance is not absolute. SubSection …Read More »- State of Maharashtra VS Shalini Krishna Kolhe & Others. A Pune Sessions Court has sentenced a woman and her mother to seven years of rigorous imprisonment for abetting the suicide of the woman’s husband in 2015. (pp. 2-3) The court found that the continuous and harsh harassment by the two …Read More »
- Supreme Court on Written Grounds of Arrest – Landmark Clarification (2025 INSC 1288) Case: Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.Bench: Justice Augustine George MasihDate: 06 November 2025 The Supreme Court has delivered a landmark judgment reinforcing the constitutional safeguard under Article 22(1) of the Constitution and Section …Read More »
- In Anurag Vijaykumar Goel v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (Crl. A. No. 5277 of 2024), the Supreme Court delivered a significant judgment on August 5, 2025, dissolving the marriage of the parties under Article 142 of the Constitution due to an irretrievable breakdown of marriage and clarified that LinkedIn …Read More »
- Case Title: Mukund Kumar Jha vs. Rita JhaCourt: High Court of DelhiCoram: Justice Anil Kshetrapal & Justice Harish Vaidyanathan ShankarJudgment Reserved On: 19 August 2025Judgment Delivered On: 27 August 2025Case No.: MAT.APP.(F.C.) 49/2025 Background Key Facts Appellant’s Contentions (Wife) Respondent’s Contentions (Husband) Court’s Observations Decision Key TakeawaysRead More »
- Case Title: Ravi Prakash Saxena @ Ravi Prakash vs. Priyanka RaniCourt: Patna High CourtCoram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Bibek ChaudhuriDate of Judgment: 04 September 2025Case No.: Criminal Revision No. 676 of 2024 Background Petitioner’s Contentions Respondent’s Contentions Court’s Observations Decision Key Takeaways Suggested Titles for Web PostRead More »
Recent Posts
- Kerala High Court: Adultery Requires Only ‘Preponderance of Probability’, Not Criminal-Level Proof
- 7 years of battle …. Wife and mother in law’s convicted and sentenced 7 years of imprisonment
- Police Must Give Written Reasons for Arrest: Supreme Court ( Mihir Rajesh Shah v. State of Maharashtra & Anr. )
- SC: LinkedIn Profile Not Valid Proof of Income, Rejects Wife’s demand of ₹12 Crores alimony. Quashes 498A Case and Grants Divorce
- Delhi HC annulled Marriage Over Concealment of Wife’s Infertility
- Patna High Court Sets Aside ₹20K Monthly Maintenance, Affidavits of Assets & Liabilities Must Be Filed Before Deciding Maintenance Rajnish v. Neha
- Delhi High Court Upholds Divorce After Year-Long Separation Despite Pending Restitution Decree
- Domestic Violence Case Quashed for Lack of Domestic Relationship : Bombay HC
- Secret recording of conversations of spouses can be used in matrimonial cases: Supreme Court
- MWT Critical Objections to Karnatak FakeNews 2025 Bill
- High Court can Quash DV U/S 482 & 528 BNSS : SC as on 19 May 2025
- Wife can’t claim maintenance , Where wife Divorced on ground of Adultery
- Supreme court guidelines and judgements on matters related to police and Judicial Process
Together we can make a difference
