R. Srinivas Kumar v. R. Shametha, (2019) 9 SCC 409 on 4 October 2019
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 — Ss. 13 and 13-B — Divorce — Irretrievable breakdown of marriage — Exercise of power by Supreme Court under Art. 142 of the Constitution, to…
Chhattisgarh HC : Court cannot pass decree for judicial separation in petition for divorce by mutual consent
Smt. Sandhya Sen Vs Sanjay Sen on 6 April 2021 Chhattisgarh HC Court cannot pass decree for judicial separation in petition for divorce by mutual consent. The provisions contained in Section 13-B…
Delhi HC: Whether the court can refuse to hear a party if it has disobeyed its interim order?
Sheikh M. Maroof vs Phoenix Arc Pvt Ltd & Ors. on 22 April, 2021 CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHIHON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLIAuthor: VIPIN SANGHI, J An order passed by…
Maheshwar Tigga vs The State Of Jharkhand on 28 September, 2020
Judgment Whether the court can convict the accused for an offence of cheating if there is no prosecution evidence that the lady maintained sexual relations under a false promise of…
Pankaj @ Sikandar Kumar Vs. State of U.T., Chandigarh and another, on 05.03.2020, PHHC
Para 5. In normal circumstances, the Court would not entertain a matter when the non compoundable offences are heinous in nature and against the public. In the instant case, the…
Sonu @ Subhash Kumar vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 1 March, 2021 SC
“11. Bearing in mind the tests which have been enunciated in the above decision, we are of the view that even assuming that all the allegations in the FIR are…
Kashinath Narayan Gharat v. State of Maharashtra on 9 Dec 2021 Bombay HC
Para 9:- In the instant case, the evidence on record indicates thatthe prosecutrix and the accused were known to each other. They had indulged in sexual relationship for a period…
Sandeep Aggarwal vs Priyanka Agarwal on 20 July, 2021, DHC MAT. APP. (F.C.) 142/2020
CORAM: MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH Dated: Pronounced on: 24.12.2021 {Para 49} The fact that the parties could not live together beyond nine weeks itself shows that…
Sushila Aggarwal and others v. State (NCT of Delhi) (2020) SSC
Coram: Justice M.R. Shah, Justice Arun Mishra, Justice Indira Banerjee, Justice Vineet Saran, Justice Ravindra Bhat The Constitutional Bench by pointing towards the difference in forms of arrest under section 438…
Rakesh Kumar v. Vijayanta Arya (DCP) and Ors on 7 December 2021 Delhi High Court
Para 2. The petitioner’s right to personal liberty is ensured by the Constitution of India. It can be curtained only by a procedure prescribed established by law. The Supreme Court…
- Go to the previous page
- 1
- …
- 16
- 17
- 18
- 19
- 20
- 21
- 22
- …
- 35
- Go to the next page