well qualified spouses desirous of remaining idle, not making efforts for the purpose of livelihood, have to be discouraged, if the society wants progress. The spouses who are quarreling and coming to the courts in respect of matrimonial disputes, have to be guided for the purpose of amicable settlement as early as possible, and, therefore, grant of luxurious, excessive facility by way of pendente lite alimony and extra expenditure has to be discouraged.”
Smt. Mamta Jaiswal vs Rajesh Jaiswal on 24 March, 2000 HC of MP
- Post published:December 16, 2021
- Post category:Domestic Violence
- Post comments:0 Comments
- Post last modified:December 16, 2021
You Might Also Like
Amitabh upadhyay Vs State of Maharashtra 25 september 2014 HC of Bombay Crl. Appeal No.1173/2013
Accused cannot be summoned for non-compliance of maintenance order under Section 31 of Domestic Violence Act: Delhi HC
