Defendant Can Cross-Examine Plaintiff Even If Suit Is Proceeding Ex-Parte Against Him & Written Statement Isn’t Filed : Supreme Court
RANJIT SINGH & ANR. APPELLANT Vs state of uttrakahandDownload
Right To Resident Under DV Act Doesn’t Supersede Rights Under Senior Citizens Act Upon Gross Ill-Treatment Of Senior Citizen: Delhi HC
Title: Pooja Mehta & Ors. v Government Of Nct Of Delhi (2024:DHC:7873) On 04 Oct 2024, Delhi High Court examined the recordings of the Divisional Commissioner and noted that the…
Denying 10-Yrs Passport Validity To undertrial Lacks Statutory Backing, Undermines Presumption Of Innocence: Rajasthan High Court
Rajasthan High Court in the matter Abhayjeet Singh v State of Rajasthan has ruled that reducing the validity period of passport from prescribed 10 years to only 1 year for…
Punjab and Haryana High Court Orders ₹1 Lakh Fine on Woman for Non-Cooperation in Section 498A Case Quashing
The Punjab and Haryana High Court recently levied a ₹1 lakh fine on a woman who did not provide her consent for the dismissal of a cruelty case she had…
Non-Bailable Warrants Shouldn’t Be Issued Unless Accused Charged With Heinous Crime Is Likely To Abscond Or Destroy Evidence: Supreme Court
SHARIF AHMED AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER on 01 May 2024 , SC On 1st May 2024 , The Supreme Court cautioned against the routine issuance…
Madras HC : Despite Criminal trial, Orders passport authority with 10-year validity to Karti Chidambaram
CHENNAI: Madras high court has ordered the regional passport authority to issue a passport with a validity of 10 years to Congress leader and Sivaganga MP Karti P Chidambaram. Justice…
Section 65B Evidence Act : SC
ARJUN PANDITRAO KHOTKAR vs KAILASH KUSHANRAO GORANTYAL AND ORS SC, as on Dated 14 July 2020 Certificate not required if original document is produced: The Supreme Court referring to Section…
Accused Who Surrenders Before Court Can’t Be Taken In Custody When Court Hasn’t Issued Summoning Order After Taking Cognizance: SC
SOUVIK BHATTACHARYA Vs ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, SC as on Dated 16 February 2024 In the recent judgement by the double bench of Hon’ble judges of Supreme court of India , It…
Recorded phone conversation admissible as evidence even if obtained illegally: Allahabad High Court
Mahant Prasad Ram Tripathi @ M.P.R. Tripathi vs State Of U.P. Thru. C.B.I. / A.C.B., Lucknow And Another mahant-prasad-ram-tripathi-mpr-tripathi-vs-state-of-up-thru-cbi-acb-lucknow-and-another-2023-livelaw-ab-302-criminal-revision-no-935-of-2023-allahabad-high-court-489963Download