Non-Bailable Warrants Shouldn’t Be Issued Unless Accused Charged With Heinous Crime Is Likely To Abscond Or Destroy Evidence: Supreme Court

SHARIF AHMED AND ANOTHER Vs STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH AND ANOTHER on 01 May 2024 , SC On 1st May 2024 , The Supreme Court cautioned against the routine issuance…

Continue ReadingNon-Bailable Warrants Shouldn’t Be Issued Unless Accused Charged With Heinous Crime Is Likely To Abscond Or Destroy Evidence: Supreme Court

Accused Who Surrenders Before Court Can’t Be Taken In Custody When Court Hasn’t Issued Summoning Order After Taking Cognizance: SC

SOUVIK BHATTACHARYA Vs ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE, SC as on Dated 16 February 2024 In the recent judgement by the double bench of  Hon’ble judges of Supreme court of India  , It…

Continue ReadingAccused Who Surrenders Before Court Can’t Be Taken In Custody When Court Hasn’t Issued Summoning Order After Taking Cognizance: SC

Recorded phone conversation admissible as evidence even if obtained illegally: Allahabad High Court

Mahant Prasad Ram Tripathi @ M.P.R. Tripathi vs State Of U.P. Thru. C.B.I. / A.C.B., Lucknow And Another mahant-prasad-ram-tripathi-mpr-tripathi-vs-state-of-up-thru-cbi-acb-lucknow-and-another-2023-livelaw-ab-302-criminal-revision-no-935-of-2023-allahabad-high-court-489963Download

Continue ReadingRecorded phone conversation admissible as evidence even if obtained illegally: Allahabad High Court

Court has to go into details of allegations made against each accused, to sub serve the requirement of law: SC

Smt. Rumidhar Ver. State of West Bengal 2009 (6) SCC 364. The Hon’ble Supreme   Court   held   that   the   Magistrate   while   entertaining   the   discharge petition U/Sec.239 Cr.P.C he has to go…

Continue ReadingCourt has to go into details of allegations made against each accused, to sub serve the requirement of law: SC