A spouse who is well qualified to get the service immediately with less efforts is not expected to remain idle to squeeze out, to milk out the other spouse by relieving him of his or her own purse by a cut in the nature of pendent lite alimony. The law does not expect the increasing number of such idle persons who by remaining in the arena of legal battles, try to squeeze out the adversary by implementing the provisions of law suitable to their purpose.
Damanpreet Kaur vs Indermeet Juneja & Anr. on 14 May, 2012 HC of Delhi CRL. REV.P. 344/2011
![You are currently viewing Damanpreet Kaur vs Indermeet Juneja & Anr. on 14 May, 2012 HC of Delhi CRL. REV.P. 344/2011](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court.webp)
- Post published:December 14, 2021
- Post category:Domestic Violence
- Post comments:0 Comments
- Post last modified:December 14, 2021
You Might Also Like
![Read more about the article Anil Kumar vs Shashi Bala And Others on 2 May, 2017 HC of Himachal Pradesh](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)
Anil Kumar vs Shashi Bala And Others on 2 May, 2017 HC of Himachal Pradesh
![Read more about the article Amitabh upadhyay Vs State of Maharashtra 25 september 2014 HC of Bombay Crl. Appeal No.1173/2013](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/unnamed.png)
Amitabh upadhyay Vs State of Maharashtra 25 september 2014 HC of Bombay Crl. Appeal No.1173/2013
![Read more about the article Has Become Common Practice To Convert Some Other Dispute Into Domestic Violence Complaint : Kerala HC Asks Magistrates To Act With Caution](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)