In order to lodge a proper compliant, mere mention of the sections and the language of those sections is not be all and end of the matter. What is required to be brought to the notice of the court is the particulars of the offence committed by each and every accused and the role played by each and every accused in committing of that offence. When we see the complaint, the complaint is sadly vague.”
Neelu Chopra & Anr vs Bharti on 7 October, 2009 SC Crl. Appeal No. 949 of 2003
![You are currently viewing Neelu Chopra & Anr vs Bharti on 7 October, 2009 SC Crl. Appeal No. 949 of 2003](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/498a-ipc.jpg)
- Post published:December 17, 2021
- Post category:498A
- Post comments:0 Comments
- Post last modified:December 17, 2021
You Might Also Like
![Read more about the article MP High Court : Quashes Proceedings Against Husband’s Relatives Upon Noting Allegations Lacked Specificity Such As Date & Time Of Dowry Demand](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)
MP High Court : Quashes Proceedings Against Husband’s Relatives Upon Noting Allegations Lacked Specificity Such As Date & Time Of Dowry Demand
![Read more about the article Bomma Ilaiah vs The State Of A.P. Rep. By Public on 9 January, 2003 Andhra Hc](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/498a-ipc-300x173.jpg)
Bomma Ilaiah vs The State Of A.P. Rep. By Public on 9 January, 2003 Andhra Hc
![Read more about the article Supreme Court Imposes Rs 5 Lakh Cost On Wife’s Father For Filing False Cases At Different Places To Harass Husband](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)