So far as cruelty alleged by the complainant is concerned, the complaint is once again vague and general ……..Though the complainant has stated that five months after the birth of the male child, he was turned out of the matrimonial home, she has not specified as to who has done so.”
Raj Pal Singh vs State Of Haryana on 26 April, 2000 HC of Punjab & Haryana
![You are currently viewing Raj Pal Singh vs State Of Haryana on 26 April, 2000 HC of Punjab & Haryana](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/498a-ipc.jpg)
- Post published:December 17, 2021
- Post category:498A
- Post comments:0 Comments
- Post last modified:December 17, 2021
You Might Also Like
![Read more about the article Shobhnaben Chelshankar Shukla vs. Shekhar Sharad Prabhakar Vyas in the High Court of Gujarat on 02 Dec 2010](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/498a-ipc-300x173.jpg)
Shobhnaben Chelshankar Shukla vs. Shekhar Sharad Prabhakar Vyas in the High Court of Gujarat on 02 Dec 2010
![Read more about the article MP High Court : Quashes Proceedings Against Husband’s Relatives Upon Noting Allegations Lacked Specificity Such As Date & Time Of Dowry Demand](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/56685-court-300x169.webp)
MP High Court : Quashes Proceedings Against Husband’s Relatives Upon Noting Allegations Lacked Specificity Such As Date & Time Of Dowry Demand
![Read more about the article Sheoraj Singh Ahlawat & Ors vs State Of U.P.& Anr on 9 November, 2012 SC CRL Appeal No. 1803/2012](https://www.menwelfare.in/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/498a-ipc-300x173.jpg)